Our Bastard
"Of course, he's a bastard, but he's our bastard!"
President Franklin D Roosevelt
President Roosevelt was referring to a Latin-American dictator backed by the United States, but the same could be said of President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan today. Despite widespread corruption and drug-dealing, and charges that Karzai stole the 2009 presidential election, President Barack Obama has decided to send an additional 30,000 US soldiers to help his administration defeat the Islamist fanatic Taliban movement.
Who is this guy? Hamid Karzai was born near Kandahar, Afghanistan, in December of 1957. His father and uncles were prominent members of the Pashtun tribe, and served in the government of King Zahir Shah. After the Soviet invasion of the country in 1980, Karzai worked with the CIA to transfer funds to the Islamist mujahadeen militants, who were fighting the Soviets. After the Soviet-backed government fell, Hamid Karzai was appointed Deputy Foreign Minister of Afghanistan by President Rabbani. When the Taliban took over a few years later, they offered Karzai the post of Ambassador to the United Nations, but he declined the job. Karzai became increasingly hostile to the Taliban, and later joined the Northern Alliance, a Pashtun-led confederation of tribes determined to oust the Taliban.
After the Northern Alliance, with the help of American and allied armed forces, deposed the Taliban in December, 2001, leaders of the Alliance selected Hamid Karzai as interim President of Afghanistan, and he has governed the country ever since. (1)
As noted in our September 25, 2009, posting (Obama's War), helping the Karzai government defeat the Taliban is our only hope of preventing Afghanistan from again becoming a safe-haven for Al Qaeda terrorists. If, God forbid, the Taliban took over Afghanistan, the allied Taliban fighters in Pakistan would have a base from which to continue their struggle indefinitely. Even the slightest risk that a crackpot group like the Taliban might someday get their hands on Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is ample reason to keep fighting against them in both Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Although I have no first-hand knowledge of affairs in that remote mountain nation, I am willing to believe the worst about Karzai and his regime. While I loathe risking American lives to keep that regime in power, I consider the real alternative----Taliban rule-----far worse. Although we would like to have a working democracy on our side, sometimes we must support a non-democratic ally. Just as the US backed the Stalinist Soviet Union against Nazi Germany, we must continue to back the Karzai government against the Taliban.
But will the people of Afghanistan risk their lives to defend a regime that probably stole the last election from them? Unless they want to live under Sharia (Islamic) law as interpreted by Mullah Omar and his minions, that is exactly what they will have to do!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Wikipedia biography.
President Franklin D Roosevelt
President Roosevelt was referring to a Latin-American dictator backed by the United States, but the same could be said of President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan today. Despite widespread corruption and drug-dealing, and charges that Karzai stole the 2009 presidential election, President Barack Obama has decided to send an additional 30,000 US soldiers to help his administration defeat the Islamist fanatic Taliban movement.
Who is this guy? Hamid Karzai was born near Kandahar, Afghanistan, in December of 1957. His father and uncles were prominent members of the Pashtun tribe, and served in the government of King Zahir Shah. After the Soviet invasion of the country in 1980, Karzai worked with the CIA to transfer funds to the Islamist mujahadeen militants, who were fighting the Soviets. After the Soviet-backed government fell, Hamid Karzai was appointed Deputy Foreign Minister of Afghanistan by President Rabbani. When the Taliban took over a few years later, they offered Karzai the post of Ambassador to the United Nations, but he declined the job. Karzai became increasingly hostile to the Taliban, and later joined the Northern Alliance, a Pashtun-led confederation of tribes determined to oust the Taliban.
After the Northern Alliance, with the help of American and allied armed forces, deposed the Taliban in December, 2001, leaders of the Alliance selected Hamid Karzai as interim President of Afghanistan, and he has governed the country ever since. (1)
As noted in our September 25, 2009, posting (Obama's War), helping the Karzai government defeat the Taliban is our only hope of preventing Afghanistan from again becoming a safe-haven for Al Qaeda terrorists. If, God forbid, the Taliban took over Afghanistan, the allied Taliban fighters in Pakistan would have a base from which to continue their struggle indefinitely. Even the slightest risk that a crackpot group like the Taliban might someday get their hands on Pakistan's nuclear arsenal is ample reason to keep fighting against them in both Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Although I have no first-hand knowledge of affairs in that remote mountain nation, I am willing to believe the worst about Karzai and his regime. While I loathe risking American lives to keep that regime in power, I consider the real alternative----Taliban rule-----far worse. Although we would like to have a working democracy on our side, sometimes we must support a non-democratic ally. Just as the US backed the Stalinist Soviet Union against Nazi Germany, we must continue to back the Karzai government against the Taliban.
But will the people of Afghanistan risk their lives to defend a regime that probably stole the last election from them? Unless they want to live under Sharia (Islamic) law as interpreted by Mullah Omar and his minions, that is exactly what they will have to do!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Wikipedia biography.
Labels: Afghanistan, Karzai