Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Hillary on Truth Serum

"Clinton told (AIPAC) that provocative Israeli land policies in areas claimed by the Palestinians are not in Israel's long-term interests."
Associated Press, March 23, 2010

During the heyday of the Soviet Union, KGB agents would close-in on an enemy of the regime on a busy street and use an umbrella point (or the like) to inject poison into the victim. Imagine for a moment that an equally unscrupulous person today could obtain a powerful truth serum and inject it into an important public figure, making it impossible for the victim to lie for hours. For example, if this had been done to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just before her AIPAC speech, would the speech have been any different?

I surmise that the speech would have more like this: (edited to preserve the Glazerbeam's G-rating)

" I am supposed to say that I'm so pleased to be here today, but the truth is that I would rather be undergoing a colonoscopy with a rusty roto-rooter right now. That is because you all hate what the President, Vice President and I have been saying these past few days about Israeli plans to build Jewish housing in East Jerusalem.

Now you know and I know that the more Jews live in an area, the less likely that area is to wind-up in a Palestinian state. So, the more solidly- Jewish a neighborhood in any part of Jerusalem is, the more absurd it becomes to pretend that Israel will ever cede it to Arab rule. Now, some say that President Obama is deeply concerned about building homes for Jews in East Jerusalem; the fact is that he doesn't give a rat's (rectum) if the Israelis put up a (expletive deleted)ing Trump Tower there, and neither do I!

The reason that we are blowing a (expletive deleted)ing ton of political capital on this (urine)ant issue is that while Israeli interests are measured in meters, America's interests are measured in continents. We are fighting Al Qaeda, the Taliban and the like in three Muslim countries right now: Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Without Muslim support, we can't win. And all Muslims hate Israel, more or less. Osama bin Laden and other jihadists never miss a chance to link the United States with Israel, and they are smart to do that! If we go along with every (expletive deleted)ing thing that Israel does, we play into that. That is why George W Bush was so ineffective in the Muslim world, and why Barack Obama had to give that speech in Cairo to show that he would be more attuned to Muslim and Arab interests.

So, we have to show the world that there is daylight between the US and Israel, especially on Jerusalem, a real flashpoint for devout Muslims. We have to do it out loud and in public to have any impact. Of course, we know that the Israeli government won't like it, but what are they going to do: give back the $3 billion?

If the President really wanted to make Israel knuckle-under, he would recall our ambassador from Tel Aviv. If that didn't get Netanyahu's attention, he would suspend military co-operation. And if that didn't work, he could impound the whole (expletive-deleted)ing three billion! And that probably would work!
J Street would be ecstatic! So, why doesn't he do it? He knows that Bill got impeached for (expletive deleted)ing just one Jew, and he ain't going to find out what the pay-back would be for doing that to a whole (expletive deleted)ing country of 'em!

So, Barack and I are caught between (urinating)-off the Jews of America and (urinating)-off the whole Muslim world. That's why we talk tough to Israel, but don't really do anything to make Israel listen. Even so, we know we are killing Democrats in New York; a Republican will probably take my old senate seat, and Democratic congressmen in Jewish areas are likely to go down in flames too. If it costs his own re-election bid in 2012, tough (manure)!

So why antagonize the Israel Lobby? Because Barack puts the geopolitical interests of the United States of America above the domestic political interests of the Democratic Party! Yes, its (expletive deleted)ing patriotism! The next edition of Profiles in Courage will have a chapter on Barack Obama!

I hope you appreciate being told the truth for a change, but if you don"t , you can kiss my (donkey)! Happy Passover, anyway.

Labels: , , , ,

1 Comments:

Anonymous Ivan said...

It is very hard to comment on hypothetical fiction which is why I suspect Mr Glazer wrote this fiction. This makes it very difficult to separate Mr Glazer's opinion from Hillary's opinions and his opinion about Hillary's opinions and thus makes criticism of the thesis difficult because there is no real thesis.

I am a scientist and therefore a realist so I don't like to put my thoughts into the heads of others or to fictionalize real problems. Therefore, I will just reply to the facts.

Hillary criticized Israel for announcing plans to build 1600 houses in the capital of Israel which also happens to be the holiest site in Judaism and the city which was the capital of the Jewish state of Judah (Judea) for over 1000 years. The audacity of that was incredible. The insulting nature of that to every Jew on earth and every lover of Israel on earth was disgusting.

If Hillary and Obama are so deluded and irrational that they think that criticizing Israel will bring peace to any part of the world, then we are all in big trouble. Obama's apologizing for things the USA has not done to every Muslim and Arab dictator in the world has accomplished nothing.

Iran is going full steam ahead in developing its nuclear bomb which threatens the entire middle east (and further given they also have long range missles) and Obama and Hillary spend their time and energy crticizing Israel for wanting to build houses in their capital city.

Obama's kissing of Arab asses and his attacks on USA's only friend in the Middle east, i.e. Israel, is self destructive for the USA. Does Obama really think that if Israel did not exist Islam would not be threatening and attacking the entire non-Muslim world?

While Mr Glazer has his fantasies about what is in Obama's head, Obama's actions speak very loudly and clearly. Obama clearly hates Israel and also Jews and he is doing everything in his power to destroy Israel.

Mr Glazer suggests that if Obama had evil intentions regarding Israel he would do some things, but the truth is he is doing those things as much as possible.

Obama has already refused to sell Israel any new military hardware although he has sold these same items to almost every Arab state. These include new missles, jets and helicopters.

Obama cannot legally (although Obamna seems to not be constrained by the US Constitution) impound the 3 billion because this payment is part of a bill enacted by Coingress decades ago. There is no doubt Obama would have impounded that money of he could (since Obama is not constrained by the US Constitution he will find a way to do this next year).

While Obama has not recalled the US ambassador to Israel, Obama did refuse to see Israels PM last year and while Obama has been to many Muslim countries (and will go to more very soon) he has not been to Israel This is as much as a snub as recalling an ambassador.

It is dissapointing, but understandable given Mr Glazer's strong support for Obama, that he gives Obama a free pass on his obvious and clear hatred of Israel.

It is also dissapointing, although again understandable given Mr Glazer's strong support for Obama, that Mr Glazer treats so flippantly an issue that is so important to every Jew on earth.

I can only conclude from this farse that Mr Glazer so strongly supports Obama that he is willing to obscure and deny the obvious anti-Israel actions and biases of Barrack Hussien Obama.

10:40 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home