Stem Cell Distortion
"Mark Green says he's going to outlaw stem cell research..."
Woman in pro-Doyle attack ad
The only trouble with this claim is that Republican Representative Mark Green of Green Bay, who is opposing Governor Jim Doyle in the November election, never said that, voted that way, or introduced legislation to outlaw stem cell research.
Doyle and Green do differ on stem cell research, and this difference is a legitimate issue in the gubernatorial campaign. However, candidates and their advertizers must be careful to state correctly the positions of their riva s before they attack them. It is intellectually dishonest to attribute some absurd view to another candidate, and then lambaste him for holding it.
Here are the real issues. President George Bush vetoed a bill for funding of embryonic stem cell research. Under this bill, the government would pay for experiments using stem cells removed from human embryos that were created through "in vitro" (test-tube) fertilization. If these embryos were successfully implanted in a suitable womb, they could grow into babies; in fact, the President had a number of children who had grown from such embryos at his veto ceremony. However, the vast majority of embryos produced are never used, and are ultimately destroyed, whether or not any stem cells are extracted from them.
Since embryonic stem cells can mature into any kind of cell in the human body, it is plausible that replacing diseased cells with healthy stem cells might cure many diseases that originate in cellular misfunction, such as cancer, diabetes, and Parkinson's. For this reason, Governor Doyle and the majority of both Houses of Congress support stem cell research. However, President Bush believes it is morally wrong to use cells from living human tissue for these experiments, and some Christian leaders agree. This is why Rep. Green voted against the bill and to sustain the President's veto .
My own view is that since the embryos cannot grow into people unless they are implanted, and there is no moral obligation to implant all these embryos, the cells of the embryos should be available for scientifc research. Although success in curing (or perhaps preventing) diseases with stem cells is not certain at this time, I believe that the prospect of doing so is great enough to justify federal funding of the research.
Of course Rep. Green's votes on this bill are fair-game for political attack, but it was wrong to accuse the congressman of trying to "outlaw stem cell research." In fact, Green had previously voted in favor of funding research on existing stem cell lines, which President Bush has also approved. Moreover, adult stem cells also can be used for research, but apparently embryonic stem cells are more promising. In addition, neither the bill in question nor any other bill ever supported by Mark Green, would have "outlawed stem cell research."(1) In fact, states and private industry are free to sponsor embryonic stem cell research, and Republican Governor Schwartznegger of California has just signed a bill to do so.
It would have been difficult and complicated to explain Rep. Green's actual position on embryonic stem cell use (limit federal funding to existing lines) in a brief TV ad, but that does not excuse distorting his position for emotional and political effect. Sure, let us debate stem cell research in this campaign, but let's keep the debate honest.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Green voted to ban the use of embryos for human cloning, but would permit research on existing stem cell lines.
Woman in pro-Doyle attack ad
The only trouble with this claim is that Republican Representative Mark Green of Green Bay, who is opposing Governor Jim Doyle in the November election, never said that, voted that way, or introduced legislation to outlaw stem cell research.
Doyle and Green do differ on stem cell research, and this difference is a legitimate issue in the gubernatorial campaign. However, candidates and their advertizers must be careful to state correctly the positions of their riva s before they attack them. It is intellectually dishonest to attribute some absurd view to another candidate, and then lambaste him for holding it.
Here are the real issues. President George Bush vetoed a bill for funding of embryonic stem cell research. Under this bill, the government would pay for experiments using stem cells removed from human embryos that were created through "in vitro" (test-tube) fertilization. If these embryos were successfully implanted in a suitable womb, they could grow into babies; in fact, the President had a number of children who had grown from such embryos at his veto ceremony. However, the vast majority of embryos produced are never used, and are ultimately destroyed, whether or not any stem cells are extracted from them.
Since embryonic stem cells can mature into any kind of cell in the human body, it is plausible that replacing diseased cells with healthy stem cells might cure many diseases that originate in cellular misfunction, such as cancer, diabetes, and Parkinson's. For this reason, Governor Doyle and the majority of both Houses of Congress support stem cell research. However, President Bush believes it is morally wrong to use cells from living human tissue for these experiments, and some Christian leaders agree. This is why Rep. Green voted against the bill and to sustain the President's veto .
My own view is that since the embryos cannot grow into people unless they are implanted, and there is no moral obligation to implant all these embryos, the cells of the embryos should be available for scientifc research. Although success in curing (or perhaps preventing) diseases with stem cells is not certain at this time, I believe that the prospect of doing so is great enough to justify federal funding of the research.
Of course Rep. Green's votes on this bill are fair-game for political attack, but it was wrong to accuse the congressman of trying to "outlaw stem cell research." In fact, Green had previously voted in favor of funding research on existing stem cell lines, which President Bush has also approved. Moreover, adult stem cells also can be used for research, but apparently embryonic stem cells are more promising. In addition, neither the bill in question nor any other bill ever supported by Mark Green, would have "outlawed stem cell research."(1) In fact, states and private industry are free to sponsor embryonic stem cell research, and Republican Governor Schwartznegger of California has just signed a bill to do so.
It would have been difficult and complicated to explain Rep. Green's actual position on embryonic stem cell use (limit federal funding to existing lines) in a brief TV ad, but that does not excuse distorting his position for emotional and political effect. Sure, let us debate stem cell research in this campaign, but let's keep the debate honest.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Green voted to ban the use of embryos for human cloning, but would permit research on existing stem cell lines.
posted by Gerald S Glazer at 11:23 AM
3 Comments:
You claim distortion but you distort as well.
You claim that "President Bush believes it is morally wrong to use cells from living human tissue for these experiments". This is false and is as much or more of a distortion as the statement by Mr. Green.
Bush has Ok'd the use of stem cells that have already been produced before he became president and there are about 20 different cellls lines that fit this category. Right now there are labs all over the country including Madison funded by the USA government who use these cells from human tissue.
In addition Bush also favors the use of human cells for stem cell research if the cells come from non-embryonic stem cells and there is much very productive studies using these human cells. In fact the only productive research so far has been with these non-emnbryonic stem cell lines.
In addition, Bush has not outlawed the use of stem cells for research purposes; he just does not allow the government to fund such research from new cell lines. Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent in stem cell reserch by private companies on embrionic stem cells all over the USA.
Mr Glazer also glosses over an very important issue here. Mr Glazer favors the use of fertilized egg cells that are left over from in vitro feritlization; but those who favor using new lines of stem cells do not necesarily limit themselves to this situation. Therefore, if one simply legalizes new emrbyonic stem cell lines and leaves the law at this; this will surely create a new industry: the creation of human embryos for profit for experimentation purposes.
Does Mr Glazer support an industry whereby human fertilized eggs, i..e human embyos, are created solely for laboratory experimentation? Sure sounds like something Hitler would have favored?
This is a very complicated issue with many important issues on all sides and ALL of the political ads from all sides have ALL been distorted. I have not seen an honest ad from either side on this issue and that includes the false ad by Michael J. Fox. It is not that he did not take his medicine, it is that he lied.
MESSAGE
digital underwater camera
olympus digital camera model
camera digital film fuji
digital camera canon
Post a Comment
<< Home