Friday, February 18, 2005

A Dime's Worth of Difference

"There is not a dime's worth of difference between the Democrat and Republican Parties!"
Alabama Governor George Wallace, candidate for President, 1968

Ralph Nader, holding far different political views, said about the same thing in 2000 and 2004, when he also ran for President on a minor-party ticket. In most democracies, such as Israel, Italy, India, France, Germany and Britain, three or more parties play key roles in government. In the United States, there is only one independent member of each house of Congress (both from Vermont, which is known to produce quirky officials). The last time a President was elected by any party but the Democrats and Republicans was 1848, when the last Whig (Zachary Taylor) won. Only once since then has a nominee of another party even come in second---former President Theodore Roosevelt, running on the Progressive (aka Bull Moose) ticket in 1912. Are the two major parties too similar, and could we use one or more major parties? Here is where things stand:

1. What is the difference between the Democratic and Republican Parties?
The Democratic Party champions the interests of the working class, the unemployed, immigrants, racial and other minorities, and the feminists. The Republicans, on the other hand, represent the interests of the wealthy, suburbanites, employers, and devout Christians. The differences should be measured in billions of dollars, not in dimes.

2. Do people vote primarily on the basis of their economic interests?
Although the main difference between the parties is economic, many voters consider social issues and foreign policy more important than their own financial situation. For example, rich Jews are even more liberal and more Democratic than middle-class Jews, unlike any other demographic group. They also tend to put friendship toward Israel above other issues. On the other hand, devout white Christians tend to vote Republican nowadays, regardless of their social-economic status.

3. What has been the role of race in America's political alignment?
The Republican Party was organized primarily to oppose slavery, and the first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln, emancipated the slaves by executive order in 1863. Most Southern Democrats supported the Confederacy during the Civil War, and northerners sympathetic to secession were Democrats too. Blacks who could vote in the decades following the Civil War were solidly Republican, for good reason. However, after federal troops were withdrawn from the South by Republican President Rutherford Hayes, white supremacists took over and blacks were denied the right to vote in that region. Until major black migration to the Northern cities during World War I, the black vote was too small to have national signficance.

4. When and why did blacks become Democrats?
The Great Depression (1929-1939) hit blacks even harder than whites, given their lack of financial assets and marginal place in the labor market. President Franklin Roosevelt, who took office in early 1933, initiated a number of steps by the federal government to alleviate poverty, such as Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC or welfare), Social Security, and so forth. Although none of these programs were specifically aimed at blacks, all poor people benefited from them, and blacks were (and still are) the poorest of all. Wherever blacks were permitted to vote,(that is, outside the Deep South) they flocked to Roosevelt and the Democratic Party.

5. When and why did the Deep South become solidly Republican in Presidential elections?
For nearly a hundred years after the Civil War, southern whites identified the Republican Party with the Union Army and Lincoln, and so continued to vote Democratic. Until 1948, the Democratic Party managed to keep the allegiance of both northern blacks and southern whites by ignoring the issue of racial equality. When the 1948 Democratic platform supported a federal civil rights bill, the southern delegations walked out and formed a splinter party, nominating South Carolina Governor Strom Thurmond for President. Thurmond carried the Deep South, but Truman won. In 1964, after Republican Senator voted against President Johnson's Civil Rights Bill, he won the Republican nomination and carried the same states as Thurmond. Alabama Governor George Wallace, who had resisted court-ordered school integration, ran as an independent for President in 1968, carrying about the same group of states. Most white southerners have voted Republican in the Presidential elections since then.

6. Many democracies have three or more major parties. Why don't we?
Israel, for example, has proportional representation in the Knesset, so even parties with a few percent of the national vote are represented and have some influence. In our system of single-member districts, only those who run first in some congressional district are in Congress at all.
The electoral college, in which only the candidate who wins a state gets any electoral votes, also reduces the impact of smaller parties.
Public financing in Presidential elections is only available to parties that won at least 5% of the vote in the last election, making it hard to start a new party.

7. What impact have third or fourth parties had on American politics?
The first national party convention was held by the tiny Anti-Masonic Party in 1840. Although the little Prohibition Party never won any elections, Prohibition became law 1919. A number of leftist parties (Populist, Socialist, Progressive, etc) won some local and congressional elections, and some of their ideas were enacted into law by the major parties.
When Ross Perot ran for President in 1992, his 19 million votes probably cut into George Bush's support in enough states to throw the election to Bill Clinton. Similarly, Ralph Nader got enough votes in 2000 inFlorida alone to swing that state, and the presidency, to George W Bush.

8. What minor parties are in contention now?
The Green Party (which nominated Nader in 2000) takes a position distinctly to the left of the Democratic Party, which most people think is left enough already. It is also the only party with an anti-Israel foreign policy plank.
The Reform Party, created by Ross Perot, elected former wrestler Jesse Ventura Governor of Minnesota in 1998 and nominated Patrick Buchanan for President in 2000. The party, without Perot's money and Ventura's fame, seems to have collapsed.
The Libertarian Party has contested every Presidential election since 1976, with little to show for its efforts. The Party opposes most taxes, most laws, foreign aid and government in general. Like a stopped clock that is right twice a day, the Libertarian Party would let you do any kind of drug you want, get an abortion, and kill yourself. How good does it get?

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Malaysia & Singapore & brunei finest online blogshop for
wholesale & quantity korean add-ons, accessories, earstuds, necklace,
rings, hair, bracelet & bracelet add-ons. Promotion 35 % wholesale price cut. Ship Worldwide
Feel free to surf my site - locksmith salt lake city ut

2:24 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi there, You've done a fantastic job. I will certainly digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am sure they'll
be benefited from this website.
Here is my site ; best general contractor winter garden

12:03 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Excellent items from you, man. I have be mindful your stuff previous to and you are
just extremely fantastic. I really like what you have received right here, certainly like what you are
stating and the best way through which you are saying it.
You're making it entertaining and you continue to care for to stay it smart. I cant wait to learn much more from you. That is actually a great web site.
Also see my site :: deploy systems

12:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey there! I just wish to offer you a big thumbs up for
the excellent info you have got here on this post.
I will be coming back to your web site for more soon.


Also visit my web blog - gracie st sugustine
my website > phil cardellas mugshot

1:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi there to all, how is the whole thing, I think every one is getting more from this
site, and your views are fastidious in favor of new people.


Here is my weblog - manfrotto

5:08 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I every time emailed this blog post page to all my associates, as if like to
read it after that my links will too.

Visit my homepage silk scarf

3:52 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...


Pull out water tap for the kitchen is built with spray wand and modern design. Gone are the days when manufacturers use plastic spray wand as they accumulate molds and mildew on the nozzles. The pull out style of shower mixer is slowly replacing the previous spray wands and adds a modern and sleek look to any kitchen. Most bath and kitchen companies are now selling pull out basin tap and make them available in a variety of colors and designs in order for them to suit any kitchen and homes.

7:06 PM  
Blogger CHEAPTAP.CO.UK -- Enjoy the water, enjoy your life! said...

into the wall tap size is fixed, after installation, it's easy to use or not kind enough to match the size of the basin, bath and so on. tap spout is not close to the edge position, otherwise it will affect the use. If the http://www.cheaptap.co.uk/waterfall-taps-c-36.html is installed independently, they do not consider the combination of internal freedom to choose the shape of the basin.

7:05 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home